[NEW] [Korean Column] Savior, where Bonjwa Starts & Ends | bonjwa – Vietnamnhanvan

sky_slasher

Profile
Blog

Joined January 2009

United States

328 Posts

Last Edited: 2009-11-09 17:18:41

#1

Original article title: What’s the Theory of Bonjwa?

It’s time to think about where the theory of Bonjwa started.

The word “Bonjwa” first came around when ‘s fans began calling him as such, after he beat to win an OSL. But the theory of Bonjwa wasn’t around; it was just a nickname. Not a Bonjwa as we know it nowadays. The best Zerg? Something like that.

Although JulyZerg and beat a Terran for a championship, GoRush was weak against and his dominance lasted little; and JulyZerg wasn’t valued high because the opponent was GoodFriend (he was also weak against ).

. It was the age of the JulyZerg and GoRush duo. But Nada’s reverse sweep against GoRush at the round of 4 and shutout against JulyZerg at the final inflicted a lasting wound to Zerg fans, and Terran seemed insurmountable to Zerg.

And a surprise came when won the

He was valued low; the word of “winning after beating Protoss only” came around and he was thought to be lucky. More precisely, he was considered the one who ruined the return of a hero – Reach; some unknown person who ruined the show. The attribute wasn’t that wrong considering the mood of the time.

Maybe that’s why Savior wasn’t as welcome champion as JulyZerg and GoRush.

He became a champion without being glorified by the glib OGN commentator Um. MBC Game didn’t totally feel satisfied with his win, thinking that the push for the return of the hero backfired.

When the hope of a Zerg champion was accomplished, the solution against Terran wasn’t ready. In this weird time, Savior came to the experimental stage.

Iloveoov. The monster who began Terran’s outmacroing Zerg. The one who beat to end the romantic age of strategy and open the age of macro.

. The result was Savior’s 5:0 dominance. Including two event games earlier, it was an absolute dominance of 7:0. The championship went to , but Savior was given a due credit.

Thereby came the beginning of the “Savior assessment theory.”

The following failed. The first assessment ended.

Since then Savior’s every game came to a spotlight. Even his event games in his early days began to be analyzed and re-evaluated. The discussion on how to bring him down was omnipresent, and progamers who might beat him began to be mentioned.

In another word, after the Pringles 1, Savior’s every game became a yardstick for the assessment.

The standard was high. Besides his fans, he had to satisfy the fans of the previously dominant Zerg progamers (especially Yellow) as well as meet the conditions required by the fans of Terran and Protoss:

Of course, Savior sometimes lost, but not to the point of not satisfying the assessment. Savior assessment theory started after the Pringles 1.

From then to the March 3 revolution, he didn’t lose a single televized multiple-gamed match.

The lasting assessment continued to the last card of Protoss – Nal_rA. Savior won, and Nal_rA’s fans gave up. The tranquility of Nal_rA’s fans after the match was the silent acknowledgement. Savior went on to win his third MSL (fourth consecutive final and second consecutive win).

The jungle of the strong, MSL, was dominated by Savior’s red flag, and he became the dictator.

The assessment went on to OSL. Although Terran fan’s spiritual lord and the genius Nada coming back were ready, their matchup seemed unlikely.

But an event tournament called If Boxer went to the army without the Superfight, Savior the Bonjwa might not have existed. Really.

The result was a shutout. Savior couldn’t be stopped, crushing Starcraft’s icon with a low race like Zerg.

What remained was OSL. And the new season began.

Zerg totally failed on

[Translator’s addition: the OGN commentator Um’s remark right after Savior’s win captured the mood of the time, “Nada is a human, human! How can a human beat a god?”]

No Stacraft fan could deny him.

The theory of Bonjwa started as the Savior assessment theory, and he passed all the assessments and finalized the theory of Bonjwa.

Let’s summarize the assessments that he passed.

1. Surprise
– A newcomer winning a championship
2. The dark age of Zerg
– Rise as Zerg’s hope. Made other Zergs look same. The glorious triumph over Longinus and the Reverse Temple.
3. Overcame Terran, especially Boxer, Nada, and Iloveoov
– Win rate incomparable to other Zergs. Totally dominated the Terran trio.
4. Continuous dominance
– Win rate, most wins, ProLeague record. Three championships in a year. Five consecutive MSL final. Swept event matches.
5. Dominance over strong contemporaries
– Beat every dominant progamer of his era of every race in a multiple-gamed match (Bisu was rather a newcomer than a dominant progamer at that time).

Other aspects might exist…

But it’s hard to meet the kind of circumstances that Savior was in. The dark age for a race doesn’t come often. Neither does a demand as that race to beat someone. Dominating pretty much all tournaments in a year and meeting the strong progamers of the era at important matches are impossible without luck (Bisu and Jaedong have yet to meet each other at a multiple-gamed match at OSL or MSL).

The theory of Bonjwa has started and ended with Savior.

[This column from Fomos’ “Mania Column” section (10/19/09) – which showcases excellent articles by users – argues for one of the ideas of Bonjwa that has been around: the theory of Bonjwa has started and ended with Savior. It’s one of the very well-written pieces on the theory of Bonjwa that I’ve read, hence the sharing. Pics not part of the original column.]Original article title: What’s the Theory of Bonjwa?It’s time to think about where the theory of Bonjwa started.The word “Bonjwa” first came around when JulyZerg ‘s fans began calling him as such, after he beat Goodfriend to win an OSL. But the theory of Bonjwa wasn’t around; it was just a nickname. Not a Bonjwa as we know it nowadays. The best Zerg? Something like that.Although JulyZerg and GoRush beat a Terran for a championship, GoRush was weak against iloveoov and his dominance lasted little; and JulyZerg wasn’t valued high because the opponent was GoodFriend (he was also weak against NaDa ). IOPS OSL . It was the age of the JulyZerg and GoRush duo. But Nada’s reverse sweep against GoRush at the round of 4 and shutout against JulyZerg at the final inflicted a lasting wound to Zerg fans, and Terran seemed insurmountable to Zerg.And a surprise came when sAviOr won the UZOO MSL He was valued low; the word of “winning after beating Protoss only” came around and he was thought to be lucky. More precisely, he was considered the one who ruined the return of a hero -. The attribute wasn’t that wrong considering the mood of the time.Maybe that’s why Savior wasn’t as welcome champion as JulyZerg and GoRush.He became a champion without being glorified by the glib OGN commentator Um. MBC Game didn’t totally feel satisfied with his win, thinking that the push for the return of the hero backfired.When the hope of a Zerg champion was accomplished, the solution against Terran wasn’t ready. In this weird time, Savior came to the experimental stage.Iloveoov. The monster who began Terran’s outmacroing Zerg. The one who beat YellOw to end the romantic age of strategy and open the age of macro. CYON MSL . The result was Savior’s 5:0 dominance. Including two event games earlier, it was an absolute dominance of 7:0. The championship went to ChoJJa , but Savior was given a due credit.Thereby came the beginning of the “.”The following Pringles-1 MSL . Savior won the championship with an absolute dominance. Chojja and Nal_rA failed. The first assessment ended.Since then Savior’s every game came to a spotlight. Even his event games in his early days began to be analyzed and re-evaluated. The discussion on how to bring him down was omnipresent, and progamers who might beat him began to be mentioned.In another word, after the Pringles 1, Savior’s every game became a yardstick for the assessment.The standard was high. Besides his fans, he had to satisfy the fans of the previously dominant Zerg progamers (especially Yellow) as well as meet the conditions required by the fans of Terran and Protoss:Of course, Savior sometimes lost, but not to the point of not satisfying the assessment. Savior assessment theory started after the Pringles 1.From then to the March 3 revolution, he didn’t lose a single televized multiple-gamed match.The lasting assessment continued to the last card of Protoss – Nal_rA. Savior won, and Nal_rA’s fans gave up. The tranquility of Nal_rA’s fans after the match was the silent acknowledgement. Savior went on to win his third MSL (fourth consecutive final and second consecutive win).The jungle of the strong, MSL, was dominated by Savior’s red flag, and he became the dictator.The assessment went on to OSL. Although Terran fan’s spiritual lord BoxeR and the genius Nada coming back were ready, their matchup seemed unlikely.But an event tournament called 1st CJ Superfight was held. Savior was lucky in many ways.The result was a shutout. Savior couldn’t be stopped, crushing Starcraft’s icon with a low race like Zerg. 3rd CJ Superfight came. MSL champion vs OSL champion matchup was established for the first time. Savior beat Nada by 3:1, and no Terran fan could deny him.What remained was OSL. And the new season began.Zerg totally failed on Longinus and on the Reverse Temple . Savior survived and went to the finals of both individual leagues. At the OSL final, he beat Nada and ended the assessment theory.[Translator’s addition: the OGN commentator Um’s remark right after Savior’s win captured the mood of the time, “Nada is a human, human! How can a human beat a god?”]No Stacraft fan could deny him.The theory of Bonjwa started as the Savior assessment theory, and he passed all the assessments and finalized the theory of Bonjwa.Other aspects might exist…But it’s hard to meet the kind of circumstances that Savior was in. The dark age for a race doesn’t come often. Neither does a demand as that race to beat someone. Dominating pretty much all tournaments in a year and meeting the strong progamers of the era at important matches are impossible without luck

Sigrun

Profile
Blog

Joined February 2007

United States

1646 Posts

#2

Good read. Thanks for the translation.

Graphics

[Fin]Vittu

Profile
Blog

Joined March 2008

Canada

506 Posts

#3

good read, thanks.

i don tthink your pictures are working well

The “Finnish Metal Terran”

StylishVODs

Profile

Joined December 2005

Sweden

5331 Posts

Last Edited: 2009-11-07 08:24:30

#4

What, did he get to 5 consecutive MSL finals?
good read, pictures not working for me though

According to Reach, he is the fastest learner he has ever seen. He start bw only like 2/3 years ago. Infact, his bw history knowledge is so limited, he didn’t even know what the map Guillotine was.

ReketSomething

Profile
Blog

Joined November 2008

United States

5124 Posts

#5

NICE. Savior MSL CHAMP AGAIN!!!! in 2009…

Jaedong :3

darktreb

Profile

Joined May 2007

United States

3008 Posts

Last Edited: 2009-11-07 08:49:30

#6

On November 07 2009 17:24 StylishVODs wrote:
What, did he get to 5 consecutive MSL finals?
good read, pictures not working for me though

Yes, this insane fact is forgotten sometimes nowadays!

Also not losing a BoX for basically an entire year.

But with Savior I’ll always remember the MSL semifinals against Mind, where he lost 3-2. It was his last gasp and Mind was better, but he still could have won, and faced Bisu in what would have been probably the biggest final in SC history. I think he would have lost to Bisu but you never know.

Once he lost to Mind there it seemed clear that it was over. In my mind it’ll always be the one that got away. The one that could have been…

Yes, this insane fact is forgotten sometimes nowadays!Also not losing a BoX for basically an entire year.But with Savior I’ll always remember the MSL semifinals against Mind, where he lost 3-2. It was his last gasp and Mind was better, but he still could have won, and faced Bisu in what would have been probably the biggest final in SC history. I think he would have lost to Bisu but you never know.Once he lost to Mind there it seemed clear that it was over. In my mind it’ll always be the one that got away. The one that could have been…

Pufftrees

Profile

Joined March 2009

2442 Posts

#7

Awesome read! Something to link now when people throw that word around too much.

Savior 4 life!

Chance favors the prepared mind.

stambe

Profile

Joined May 2005

Bulgaria

474 Posts

#8

Great article. Brings us back when monsters roamed the SC world. I just love someone assessing and talking about history of SC.

Valks rulzz

SuperArc

Profile
Blog

Joined March 2009

Austria

7781 Posts

#9

Then Bisu came.

Savior was a true BoX master…Then Bisu came.

Snow – future of protoss! 🙂 Nada = baller

araav

Profile
Blog

Joined September 2004

Armenia

1590 Posts

#10

good read, thanks for translation.
The “end of Bonjwa” part was not convincing though. Jaedong seems as strong nowdays as Savior was then

The flower that blooms in adversity is the most rare and beautiful of all.

TheAntZ

Profile
Blog

Joined January 2009

Israel

6110 Posts

Last Edited: 2009-11-07 09:27:40

#11

Thanks for the translation! the word bonjwa is getting really annoying though…

43084 | Honeybadger: “So july, you’re in the GSL finals. How do you feel?!” ~ July: “HUNGRY.”

quiong

Profile

Joined January 2008

United States

267 Posts

#12

On November 07 2009 18:08 araav wrote:
good read, thanks for translation.
The “end of Bonjwa” part was not convincing though. Jaedong seems as strong nowdays as Savior was then

That’s not really the point though. It’s an article written to define bonjwa as a set of criteria (assessments) that only savior meets. One could easily define bonjwa in a different manner. Jaedong could probably pass assessment 1, 4, and 5, but not 2 and 3. 3 is debatable on whether the assessment can be met simply by defeating strong terran or if the specific trio of boxer, nada, oov must be defeated. Author’s intent is kinda murky here.

He even admits “But it’s hard to meet the kind of circumstances that Savior was in.” Jaedong could win the next 10 OSLs, but unless he invents a time machine, he cannot become bonjwa by this author’s standard.

Similarly, if someone’s definition of bonjwa states that you MUST have a golden mouse, then savior would not be one . The arguments over bonjwa are not so much about the players, but about the criterion that ought to be used.

That’s not really the point though. It’s an article written to define bonjwa as a set of criteria (assessments) that only savior meets. One could easily define bonjwa in a different manner. Jaedong could probably pass assessment 1, 4, and 5, but not 2 and 3. 3 is debatable on whether the assessment can be met simply by defeating strong terran or if the specific trio of boxer, nada, oov must be defeated. Author’s intent is kinda murky here.He even admits “But it’s hard to meet the kind of circumstances that Savior was in.” Jaedong could win the next 10 OSLs, but unless he invents a time machine, he cannot become bonjwa by this author’s standard.Similarly, if someone’s definition of bonjwa states that you MUST have a golden mouse, then savior would not be one. The arguments over bonjwa are not so much about the players, but about the criterion that ought to be used.

Heyoka

Profile
Blog

Joined March 2008

Temple of EE-Sama

22519 Posts

#13

This is pretty cool, thanks for the translation

@RealHeyoka | DreamHack StarCrafty Man

QibingZero

Profile
Blog

Joined June 2007

2608 Posts

#14

Interesting, though I guess this just proves that the definition of bonjwa is different depending on who you ask. Personally, I thought savior’s dominance was more rooted in his game management and star sense than anything else. Just about anyone who is even remotely considered bonjwa fits some of this criteria, after all.

Being a newcomer when winning a championship?

This is obvious. Boxer, GARIMTO, Nada, July, Anytime, Savior, and Jaedong have all been royal roaders. oov surfaced not only with wins, but a ridiculous style of play. Bisu came out of nowhere to win his first MSL. Flash was an unknown beating all kinds of people (including Bisu himself). Pretty much everyone who wins a starleague has made a splash on the scene – it’s just a matter of whether or not they stayed.

Better than the rest of your race? Wins on unfavorable maps?

These even fit today’s dominant players like Jaedong, Flash, and Bisu. All have been unquestionably the top of their race, and have found ways to reverse the trend on various maps (Jaedong and Flash on Katrina, for example). Jaedong is probably the best example here, since it’s taken other zergs ages to finally catch up to where he was at, and a lot of that has to do with zergs having maps in their favor now.

Overall dominance?

Savior was at about 69% for his span of 4 starleague wins and 2 MSL silvers.

Jaedong was also at 69% from EVER2007 to Bacchus 2009 (and surprisingly higher if you were to end it at Batoo instead). That’s also 4 starleague wins in almost exactly the same amount of time. He also won GOM Classic 1, WCG Korea, GOM’s special match vs Bisu, and had an MSL silver.

Flash is right at 70% from Bacchus to GOM Classic 3, and over 70% if you include his current streak. Of course, this only includes one starleague win and some GOM league ownage.

Bisu was actually a bit lower at 65% for his span of 3 Starleague wins, though his were over a slightly longer period of time (a little over 2 years, while the others are all a little under 2 years). He also won GOM Classic 2 during this time and had an MSL silver.

Interesting notes:

– Savior played around half the matches the others did in the same amount of time
– Flash and Jaedong destroyed Proleague (and really still are)
– Bisu’s lower win % has a lot to do with the fact he started off shaky in proleague, even though he fared very well in individual leagues

Winning multiple game matches?

Savior was 9-2 in bo5 matches during the period of dominance mentioned above.

Jaedong was 13-2, and has beaten Bisu so I’m really not sure what the poster is talking about (I counted Savior’s win vs Nada in Superfight, too). Maybe he means only bo5s that took place in the MSL or OSL, because Jaedong also won a bo3 they played in the MSL.

Bisu was 13-3 (1 loss to Jaedong, 1 loss to Flash).

Flash was 9-3 (2 of those losses to Jaedong).

These are ridiculous numbers when you consider that they’re happening at very much the same time as each other.

So yeah, I don’t think these are the factors that made savior bonjwa. Sure, it’s part stats, but it’s also feeling. Feeling in the same way star sense is feeling. When Savior played, you knew he was going to somehow find victory, regardless of what his opponent was doing at the time. Despite being one of the best and closest games of all time, it somehow wasn’t surprising when Savior beat Iris during Shinhan 3. That was what he did – he found victory no matter where it was hiding.

It’s that type of feeling where a player knows the game so well you sense as if he’d be no better if he were actually maphacking. Savior had it, and we’ve seen glimpses of that only a few times since (for me, a huge one was Jaedong’s comeback vs fantasy during Batoo).

Having said that, the stats I listed above are pretty crazy, and do merit discussion if we’re going to go along the path this poster would suggest.

Oh, my eSports

DoctorHelvetica

Profile
Blog

Joined July 2008

United States

14937 Posts

Last Edited: 2009-11-07 10:53:38

#15

it is universally agreed that the 4 bonjwa’s are BoxeR, NaDa, Iloveoov, and sAviOr

It’s a title given by the community. Bonjwa arguments are worthless because if you’re arguing about whether or not someone is bonjwa, then they probably aren’t bonjwa. The difference between sAviOr and Jaedong is when sAviOr was dominating, that was it, no one could touch him and no one else was even close.

When Jaedong is dominating, so is FlaSh, so is Bisu, etc. Jaedong isn’t really alone, even though he might be above the others.

RIP Aaliyah

darktreb

Profile

Joined May 2007

United States

3008 Posts

#16

On November 07 2009 19:25 QibingZero wrote:
Interesting, though I guess this just proves that the definition of bonjwa is different depending on who you ask. Personally, I thought savior’s dominance was more rooted in his game management and star sense than anything else. Just about anyone who is even remotely considered bonjwa fits some of this criteria, after all.

Being a newcomer when winning a championship?

This is obvious. Boxer, GARIMTO, Nada, July, Anytime, Savior, and Jaedong have all been royal roaders. oov surfaced not only with wins, but a ridiculous style of play. Bisu came out of nowhere to win his first MSL. Flash was an unknown beating all kinds of people (including Bisu himself). Pretty much everyone who wins a starleague has made a splash on the scene – it’s just a matter of whether or not they stayed.

Better than the rest of your race? Wins on unfavorable maps?

These even fit today’s dominant players like Jaedong, Flash, and Bisu. All have been unquestionably the top of their race, and have found ways to reverse the trend on various maps (Jaedong and Flash on Katrina, for example). Jaedong is probably the best example here, since it’s taken other zergs ages to finally catch up to where he was at, and a lot of that has to do with zergs having maps in their favor now.

Overall dominance?

Savior was at about 69% for his span of 4 starleague wins and 2 MSL silvers.

Jaedong was also at 69% from EVER2007 to Bacchus 2009 (and surprisingly higher if you were to end it at Batoo instead). That’s also 4 starleague wins in almost exactly the same amount of time. He also won GOM Classic 1, WCG Korea, GOM’s special match vs Bisu, and had an MSL silver.

Flash is right at 70% from Bacchus to GOM Classic 3, and over 70% if you include his current streak. Of course, this only includes one starleague win and some GOM league ownage.

Bisu was actually a bit lower at 65% for his span of 3 Starleague wins, though his were over a slightly longer period of time (a little over 2 years, while the others are all a little under 2 years). He also won GOM Classic 2 during this time and had an MSL silver.

Interesting notes:

– Savior played around half the matches the others did in the same amount of time
– Flash and Jaedong destroyed Proleague (and really still are)
– Bisu’s lower win % has a lot to do with the fact he started off shaky in proleague, even though he fared very well in individual leagues

Winning multiple game matches?

Savior was 9-2 in bo5 matches during the period of dominance mentioned above.

Jaedong was 13-2, and has beaten Bisu so I’m really not sure what the poster is talking about (I counted Savior’s win vs Nada in Superfight, too). Maybe he means only bo5s that took place in the MSL or OSL, because Jaedong also won a bo3 they played in the MSL.

Bisu was 13-3 (1 loss to Jaedong, 1 loss to Flash).

Flash was 9-3 (2 of those losses to Jaedong).

These are ridiculous numbers when you consider that they’re happening at very much the same time as each other.

So yeah, I don’t think these are the factors that made savior bonjwa. Sure, it’s part stats, but it’s also feeling. Feeling in the same way star sense is feeling. When Savior played, you knew he was going to somehow find victory, regardless of what his opponent was doing at the time. Despite being one of the best and closest games of all time, it somehow wasn’t surprising when Savior beat Iris during Shinhan 3. That was what he did – he found victory no matter where it was hiding.

It’s that type of feeling where a player knows the game so well you sense as if he’d be no better if he were actually maphacking. Savior had it, and we’ve seen glimpses of that only a few times since (for me, a huge one was Jaedong’s comeback vs fantasy during Batoo).

Having said that, the stats I listed above are pretty crazy, and do merit discussion if we’re going to go along the path this poster would suggest.

I love how you did an analysis of “multiple game matches” and didn’t include BO3’s

The analysis was nice but come on – BO3 is part of the deal here

I love how you did an analysis of “multiple game matches” and didn’t include BO3’sThe analysis was nice but come on – BO3 is part of the deal here

siv00

Profile

Joined September 2009

261 Posts

#17

Savior was the last.

Foucault

Profile
Blog

Joined May 2009

Sweden

2826 Posts

Last Edited: 2009-11-07 11:16:38

#18

“He was valued low; the word of “winning after beating Protoss only” came around and he was thought to be lucky.”

lol. Hi ZvP, Starcraft in easy mode ;D

PS. Sky_slasher, you should get more credit. Awesome translation, thanks! Someone, give this man a blue star

I know that deep inside of you there’s a humongous set of testicles just waiting to pop out. Let ’em pop bro. //////////////////// AKA JensOfSweden // Lee Yoon Yeol forever.

reit

Profile
Blog

Joined October 2009

Canada

209 Posts

#19

jaedong is bonjwa, face it 😮

emucxg

Profile
Blog

Joined May 2007

Finland

3654 Posts

#20

On November 07 2009 20:16 reit wrote:
jaedong is bonjwa, face it 😮

nope, bisu is!!!

nope, bisu is!!!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All

Please log in or register to reply.

Ding, Dong! Jemand da? Wir haben ein Paket voller Infos für Haus an Haus zu übergeben! Bitte hier unterschreiben:

Allgemeine Infos

Am Freitag, den 5. November, ab 20 Uhr geht offiziell Haus an Haus in die Zweite Runde. Haus RBTV gegen Haus Bonjwa. Um uns gemeinsam aufzuwärmen, starten wir bereits um 19 Uhr mit einer Pre-Show. Gerne reinschalten!

Haus an Haus ist ein Event, bei dem zwei Teams in zwei verschiedenen Räumen über den Verlauf von 24 Stunden in unterschiedlichen Disziplinen gegeneinander antreten. Dieses Mal verzichten wir auf haus-interne-freundschaftliche-Rivalitäten und haben das Haus Bonjwa zum Duell aufgefordert. Die Teilnehmenden, die versuchen werden Ruhm und Ehre zu erlangen, sind:

• Team Bonjwa: Shorty, Matteo, Leon und Edopeh
• Team RBTV: Nasti, Simon, Gunnar und Krogi

Das 24h-Live-Event wird von den folgenden bezaubernden Caster*innen durchgehend kommentiert: Denzel, Eddy, Florentin, Gregor, Janina, Krane, Nils, Reinke, Steffen, Varion, Viet (Änderungen vorbehalten).

Mitfiebern könnt ihr entweder in unserem Livestream auf YouTube/Twitch oder im Livestream bei Bonjwa auf Twitch.

Regeln

Für dieses Haus an Haus haben wir uns für das progressive Punktesystem entschieden, welches ihr sicher auch von anderen Unterhaltungsshows kennt. Wer das erste Spiel für sich gewinnt, erhält einen Punkt, die Gewinner*innen des zweiten Spiels erhalten zwei Punkte, usw. Das ermöglicht uns die Spannung bei zu bewahren in dem wir das Ende offen halten, aber gleichzeitig das Event nicht unorganisch in die Länge ziehen.

Zusammengefasste Facts:

• Es wird ein Schlafkonto für jedes Team geben. Sie können die Stunden individuell aufteilen, wie sie es möchten.
• Essen werden die Teams im Shop kaufen können, aber es wird definitiv niemand verhungern – dafür wird gesorgt.
• Unglücklicherweise haben unsere Teilnehmenden einen Bug, der sie immer wieder Harndrang bekommen lässt. Es freut euch sicher zu hören, dass wir sie so programmiert haben, dass sie selbstständig eine Toilette aufsuchen dürfen, wenn ihnen danach ist. Es muss weder erspielt, noch erfragt werden.
• Kleine, letzte Randnotiz: Wir haben uns bei diesem Haus an Haus aus produktionstechnischen Gründen auf Teams aus vier Personen geeinigt.

Spiele

Es wird 24 Spieldisziplinen geben, die sich in zwei Kategorien aufteilen lassen:
Versus- und Speedrun-Spiele.

• Versus-Diszplinen: Können entweder als 1 vs. 1 oder auch Team vs. Team vorkommen. Diese Spiele wurden den Teilnehmenden im Vorfeld kommuniziert, damit sie sich fair darauf vorbereiten können. Spiele, die in diese Kategorie fallen und im Vorfeld an die Teams kommuniziert wurden, sind: Gang Beasts, Landwirtschafts-Simulator 19, Laser League, Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, Mario Party Superstars, NBA Jam: On Fire Edition, Nidhogg 2, Overcooked 2, Splitgate, Super Bomberman R, Super Mario Maker 2, Rocket League, Tekken 7, TowerFall Ascension, Treadnauts.

• Speedrun-Disziplinen: Die Uhr tickt. Welches Team schneller die Aufgabe löst, sackt die Punkte ein. Diese Spiele wurden vorher nicht an die Beteiligten kommuniziert.

Community Interaktionen

Wie beim ersten Haus an Haus wird es auch diesmal möglich sein im Vorfeld ein Team eurer Wahl zu wählen. Während des Livestreams wird es die Möglichkeit geben für dein ausgewähltes Team bestimmte Vorteile zu erspielen. Welches Spiel gespielt wird und was die Belohnung des Community-Spiels sein wird, ziehen unsere Caster*innen random aus einem Behälter. Insgesamt wird es 24-Community-Spiele geben. Um mitmachen zu können, müsst ihr folgende drei Dinge beachten:

1. Schritt:
Es wird ein Nutzer*innenkonto auf unserer Website rocketbeans.tv benötigt. Die Anmeldung geht schnell und schmerzfrei. Kein Newsletter, keine Werbung, kein Spam. Unsere AGB’s findest du hier.

2. Schritt:
Am Freitag wird auf der Startseite unserer Homepage ein Banner erscheinen, wo du einmalig dein Team wählen kannst.
Achtung! Hast du einmal ein Team gewählt, ist das nicht revidierbar. Teil des Schiffs, Teil der Crew! Wie das am Freitag auf der Homepage genau aussehen wird, könnt ihr aus dem Bild unter dieser Rubrik erkennen.

3. Schritt:
Um an den Interaktionen teilnehmen zu können, musst du ebenfalls auf unsere Webseite rocketbeans.tv gehen und auf den Joystick unter dem Stream klicken. Anschließend erscheint auf der linken Seite des Streams ein Fenster, wo die aktuelle Community-Interaktion eingeblendet wird.

Das Mitspielen ist nur mit einem Account und einem ausgewählten Team möglich, da wir Betrugsfälle vermeiden wollen.

Umgang mit Gästen

Wir haben mega Bock auf Haus an Haus und freuen uns auf alles, was kommt! Insbesondere auf unsere Freund*innen des Hauses, die unser 24-Stunden-Event vergolden: Das Team-Bonjwa, das von dem 1,50 m breiten Matteo, dem Speedy-Gonzalez-Leon, der Skill-Göttin-Shorty und dem Durchhalte-Talent-Edopeh vertreten werden wird.

Dazu die Bitte: Wir möchten, vor allem im Live-Chat sowie auf allen Kanälen, die ebenfalls von unseren Gästen verfolgt werden können, keine negativen Äußerungen über diejenigen lesen, die wir zu uns eingeladen haben. Wir haben Lust auf alle Beteiligten und erwarten, dass ihnen freundlich und offen begegnet wird und dass sie sich bei uns gut aufgehoben fühlen. Wir tolerieren keine unsachlichen, beleidigenden Urteile oder persönlichen Präferenzen in Bezug auf diese Menschen und werden bei der Moderation der Kanäle verstärkt darauf achten, dass sich unsere Gäste bei uns wohlfühlen können. Sachliche Kritik an den Inhalten ist selbstverständlich weiterhin kein Problem. Lasst uns gemeinsam dafür sorgen, dass wir alle eine tolle Haus-An-Haus Zeit haben und sowohl Gäste als auch deren Communities mit offenen Armen in Bohnenhausen begrüßt werden!

VoD’s zu Haus an Haus

Infos zu den Uploads und Uploadzeiten von Haus an Haus findet ihr in ausführlicher Form hier: Uploadplan.

Oh, Nostalgie! Lass uns nochmal ins erste Haus an Haus schauen.

Wir können dir diesen YouTube-Inhalt erst mit deiner Einwilligung anzeigen.